Originally Posted by
Jishin
I think that countries that prioritize power and wealth over environmental concerns will continue to exploit fossil fuels, even if it leads to environmental damage. This is because the economic benefits of fossil fuels, such as revenue and job creation, outweigh the potential negative impacts on the environment. Additionally, the existing infrastructure and industries surrounding fossil fuels make it difficult and costly to transition to green energy. Even if green energy becomes cheaper than fossil fuels, these countries may still choose to use fossil fuels due to political and financial incentives to maintain their dependence on them.
Society cannot universally agree on environmental issues, as perspectives on these issues vary widely based on cultural, economic, and political factors. Some may prioritize economic growth over environmental protection, while others may prioritize preserving natural resources for future generations. Not all countries have the same level of resources and infrastructure to support the transition to green energy, making it more challenging for some nations to make the switch. Addressing these challenges to implementing green energy will require a global collaboration, including financial and technical assistance to countries that need it, and a universal agreement on the importance of environmental protection. I just don’t see humanity collaborating on this issue to the degree required.
My wife and I drive EV cars. They are great but not cheap. Financially, it would have made better sense to burn fossils.
Gassho, Jishin, ST, LAH