Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 51 to 83 of 83

Thread: Did Dogen invent Shikantaza?

  1. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by jakeb View Post
    Wait .. didn’t he write a book about Dogen? I know a story about him too.

    SatToday lah
    Yes, more than one, he is one of the great "Dogenologists."

    https://terebess.hu/zen/mesterek/CarlBielefeldt.html

    What is your story?

    Gassho, J

    STLah
    ALL OF LIFE IS OUR TEMPLE

  2. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by Jundo View Post
    Yes, more than one, he is one of the great "Dogenologists."

    https://terebess.hu/zen/mesterek/CarlBielefeldt.html

    What is your story?

    Gassho, J

    STLah
    There’s a dude that trolls on Reddit whose biggest defense in the crusade to prove that Dogen was a fraud and a cult leader is using some misunderstood and out of context Bielefeldt quotes. So one day another user emailed Bielefeldt, told him the story and asked if what he meant in his book was that Dogen stole Shobogenzo and that he made up a religion and that he was basically a fraud. Bielefeldt said far from him. He respects Dogen and considers his a great master and a genius.

    SatToday lah
    Bion
    -------------------------
    When you put Buddha’s activity into practice, only then are you a buddha. When you act like a fool, then you’re a fool. - Sawaki Roshi

  3. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by jakeb View Post
    There’s a dude that trolls on Reddit whose biggest defense in the crusade to prove that Dogen was a fraud and a cult leader is using some misunderstood and out of context Bielefeldt quotes. So one day another user emailed Bielefeldt, told him the story and asked if what he meant in his book was that Dogen stole Shobogenzo and that he made up a religion and that he was basically a fraud. Bielefeldt said far from him. He respects Dogen and considers his a great master and a genius.

    SatToday lah
    I just sent a message to Jundo this morning explaining exactly the same story. Some people on the zen reddit subforum are trying to prove that Dogen never went to China, was never given Dharma transmission by Rujing and that Shikantaza is the same as "prayer-meditation". Which is funny, because there are actual scientific studies proving the benefits of zazen. Before joining TreeLeaf I read their threads for some months, but the people are incredibly toxic to each other and everyone is trying to play zen master. And some members are clearly trying to create a cult around only reading early zen masters. Plus, they also claim that zen is not connected to Buddhism in the first place...

    Gassho, Tomás
    Sat&LaH

    Sorry for going over 3 sentences.

  4. #54
    My thought is that even if all this Buddhist, Zen, shikantaza stuff turns out to be a sham there is still real benefits to sitting quietly each day and following a handful of common sense guidance on how to conduct oneself.


    Tairin
    Sat today and lah

  5. #55
    Quote Originally Posted by Tomás Sard View Post
    I just sent a message to Jundo this morning explaining exactly the same story. Some people on the zen reddit subforum are trying to prove that Dogen never went to China, was never given Dharma transmission by Rujing and that Shikantaza is the same as "prayer-meditation". Which is funny, because there are actual scientific studies proving the benefits of zazen. Before joining TreeLeaf I read their threads for some months, but the people are incredibly toxic to each other and everyone is trying to play zen master. And some members are clearly trying to create a cult.

    Gassho, Tomás
    Sat&LaH
    Nah.. Stay away. It’s not even worth the “conversations”.

    SatToday lah
    Bion
    -------------------------
    When you put Buddha’s activity into practice, only then are you a buddha. When you act like a fool, then you’re a fool. - Sawaki Roshi

  6. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by Tairin View Post
    My thought is that even if all this Buddhist, Zen, shikantaza stuff turns out to be a sham there is still real benefits to sitting quietly each day and following a handful of common sense guidance on how to conduct oneself.


    Tairin
    Sat today and lah

    This

    Doshin
    St

  7. #57
    Quote Originally Posted by Tairin View Post
    My thought is that even if all this Buddhist, Zen, shikantaza stuff turns out to be a sham there is still real benefits to sitting quietly each day and following a handful of common sense guidance on how to conduct oneself.


    Tairin
    Sat today and lah
    I think anyone who’s sat zazen for a while can attest to the fact that it is not and can not be a sham. So we’re good to continue

    SatToday lah
    Bion
    -------------------------
    When you put Buddha’s activity into practice, only then are you a buddha. When you act like a fool, then you’re a fool. - Sawaki Roshi

  8. #58
    This is why I have long been drawn to Zen (and Buddhism in general). There is plenty for the intellect to chew on, but at the end of the day, as practitioners, we are like scientists. We must take all the theories, etc. and put them to test in the lab of Zazen.



    Gassho,
    Rob

    -stlah-


    Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
    聖簡 Seikan (Sacred Simplicity)

  9. #59
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyoshin View Post
    Many of those questions were excellent, despite the elaborate gymnastics that were required in order to find reasons to reject them.
    Hi Kyoshin,

    I am just curious if you meant that the evidence I presented was the gymnastics? Or his response to the evidence?

    Granted, there was nobody in the 6th Century who said in clear words, "What I am about to teach is exactly what will be taught by someone in the future named Dogen 600 years from now." There are only hints and traces.

    Gassho, J

    STLah
    ALL OF LIFE IS OUR TEMPLE

  10. #60
    Quote Originally Posted by Jundo View Post
    Gentle speech, nobody to hell. Brad is a good fellow. But some of the Dharma punk folks around his blog back in the day ... my first lesson in the hells of the internet!

    Gassho, J

    STlah
    My apologies, it was intended as a joke, clearly turned out to be a bad one. I'm not denying Brad's genuity or authenticity. But something struck me in his lengthy response to a certain criticism : maybe is the language and I'm picking on nothing, but as some of you mentioned we don't have to agree with everyone, and not all styles will suit everyone.
    http://hardcorezen.info/in-which-i-a...iji-temple/287

    Gassho
    Sat

  11. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Jundo View Post
    Hi Kyoshin,

    I am just curious if you meant that the evidence I presented was the gymnastics? Or his response to the evidence?

    Granted, there was nobody in the 6th Century who said in clear words, "What I am about to teach is exactly what will be taught by someone in the future named Dogen 600 years from now." There are only hints and traces.

    Gassho, J

    STLah
    It’s interesting how many critics fail to consider the context of certain things. Like ignoring the fact that the ancient masters made references to a variety of sutras, clearly assuming their audience (other monks and monastics) were familiar with what they were talking about. Yet they didn’t focus on writing about sutras and chanting. It was clearly part of their daily routine and practice and there was no need in their time and at that moment to address that particular topic. Same goes for the zazen topic. Every single master speaks of zazen in one form or another although the way they address the issue is based on the needs of their monastic communities, thus they were sometimes criticizing those who became overly attached to their zafus and zazen to the point where it became a tool and lacked any substance or sincerity. I believe it was Foyan who spent quite some time criticizing those stuck cross-legged, insisting on the need to attain understanding, on letting go of concepts and judgments, on having faith and trust in the dharma, yet he ends with a chapter dedicated to zazen, detailing how it it to be done and saying: “if you meditate, why not sit and if you sit, why not meditate?”
    Only those who choose it can’t see the place zazen has had in Buddhist practice and especially Zen.

    So sorry about the extra long reply. I’ll behave from now!

    SatToday lah
    Bion
    -------------------------
    When you put Buddha’s activity into practice, only then are you a buddha. When you act like a fool, then you’re a fool. - Sawaki Roshi

  12. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by Jundo View Post
    Hi Kyoshin,

    I am just curious if you meant that the evidence I presented was the gymnastics? Or his response to the evidence?

    Granted, there was nobody in the 6th Century who said in clear words, "What I am about to teach is exactly what will be taught by someone in the future named Dogen 600 years from now." There are only hints and traces.

    Gassho, J

    STLah
    Sorry for the confusion. I meant that AJ appeared to be doing gymnastics in order to find reasons to be dissatisfied with your answers.
    Gassho
    Kyōshin
    Satlah

    Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk

  13. #63
    Another small sign of the "roots" of Shikantaza is in the Xin Xin Ming (Inscription on Trust in Mind), a classic chant of the Soto school traditionally attributed to the 3rd Ancestor in Chiina, Sengcan. In fact, it is probably not by Sengcan, but scholars still believe that it is from early on in the Tang Dynasty, maybe 7th-8th century C.E. It has been celebrated in the Zen Lineages for over 1000 years. It certainly expresses the equanimity, non-choosing, neither running toward and entangling with the world nor running away that Master Dogen conveys in Fukanzazengi ...

    In Fukanzazengi, he writes:

    FUNDAMENTALLY SPEAKING, the basis of the way is perfectly pervasive ... The vehicle of the ancestors is naturally
    unrestricted ... Surely the whole being is far beyond defilement ... And yet, if a hair's breadth of distinction exists, the gap is like that between heaven and earth; once the slightest like or dislike arises, all is confused and the mind is lost. ... Cast aside all involvements and discontinue all affairs. Do not think of good or evil; do not deal with right or wrong. Halt the revolutions of mind, intellect, and consciousness; stop the calculations of thoughts, ideas, and perceptions. Do not intend to make a Buddha, much less be attached to sitting still
    Some of those lines are from the Xin Xin Ming directly ...

    The Great Way is not difficult
    for those who have no preferences.
    When love [likes] and hate [dislikes] are both absent
    everything becomes clear and undisguised.
    Make a hairbreadth difference, and Heaven and Earth are set apart;

    ...

    If you wish to see the truth
    then hold no opinions for or against anything.
    To set up what you like against what you dislike
    is the disease of the mind.

    ...

    The Way is perfect like vast space
    where nothing is lacking and nothing is in excess.
    Indeed, it is due to our choosing to accept or reject
    that we do not see the true nature of things.
    Be serene in the Oneness [wholeness] of things
    and such erroneous views will disappear by themselves.

    ...

    When you try to stop activity to achieve passivity
    your very effort fills you with activity.
    As long as you remain in one extreme or the other,
    you will never know [Wholeness].

    ...

    To deny the reality of things is to miss their reality;
    to assert the emptiness of things
    is to miss their reality.

    ...

    The more you talk and think about it,
    the further astray you wander from the truth.
    Stop talking and thinking
    and there is nothing you will not be able to know.

    ...

    Do not search for the truth;
    only cease to cherish opinions.

    ...

    When the mind exists undisturbed in the Way,
    nothing in the world can offend,
    and when a thing can no longer offend,
    it ceases to exist in the old way.

    ...

    When no discriminating thoughts arise,
    the old mind ceases to exist.
    When thought objects vanish,
    the thinking-subject vanishes,
    and when the mind vanishes, objects vanish.

    Things are objects because there is a subject or mind;
    and the mind is a subject because there are objects.
    Understand the relativity of these two
    and the basic reality: the unity of emptiness.
    In this Emptiness the two are indistinguishable
    and each contains in itself the whole world.

    ...

    Clinging cannot be limited;
    even to be attached to the idea of enlightenment
    is to go astray.
    Just let things be in their own way
    and there will be neither coming nor going.

    ...

    The burdensome practice of judging
    brings annoyance and weariness.
    What benefit can be derived
    from distinctions and separations?

    ...

    If you wish to move in the One Way
    do not dislike even the world of senses and ideas.
    Indeed, to accept them fully
    is identical with true Enlightenment.

    ...

    The wise man strives to no goals
    but the foolish man fetters himself.

    ...

    Rest and unrest derive from illusion;
    with enlightenment there is no liking and disliking.
    All dualities come from ignorant inference.
    They are like dreams of flowers in air:
    foolish to try to grasp them.
    Gain and loss, right and wrong;
    such thoughts must finally be abolished at once.

    ...

    If the mind makes no discriminations,
    the ten thousand things
    are as they are, of single essence.

    ...

    To understand the mystery of this One-essence
    is to be released from all entanglements.

    ...

    Consider motion in stillness
    and stillness in motion;
    both movement and stillness disappear.
    When such dualities cease to exist
    Oneness itself cannot exist.
    To this ultimate finality
    no law or description applies.

    For the unified mind in accord with the Way
    all self-centered striving ceases.
    Doubts and irresolutions vanish
    and life in true faith is possible.

    ...

    nothing clings to us and we hold to nothing.
    All is empty, clear, self-illuminating,
    with no exertion of the mind's power.
    Here thought, feeling, knowledge, and imagination are of no value.
    In this world of Suchness
    there is neither self nor other-than-self.

    ...

    To come directly into harmony with this reality
    just simply say when doubt arises, "Not two."
    In this "not two" nothing is separate,
    nothing is excluded.
    No matter when or where,
    enlightenment means entering this truth.
    And this truth is beyond extension or diminution in time or space;
    in it a single thought is ten thousand years.

    ...

    Emptiness here, Emptiness there,
    but the infinite universe stands always before your eyes.

    Infinitely large and infinitely small;
    no difference, for definitions have vanished
    and no boundaries are seen.
    So too with Being and non-Being.
    Waste no time in doubts and arguments
    that have nothing to do with this.

    ...

    One thing, all things;
    move among and intermingle,
    without distinction.
    To live in this realization
    is to be without anxiety about nonperfection.
    To live in this faith is the road to nonduality,
    because the nondual is one with the trusting mind.

    ...

    Words!
    The Way is beyond language,
    for in it there is

    no yesterday

    no tomorrow

    no today.

    https://terebess.hu/english/hsin.html
    Now, if that is not precisely the attitude of sitting in the equanimity of Shikantaza, neither running from the world nor toward it, non-gaining, not discriminating, free of opinions, without aversions [dislikes] and attractions [likes], dropping thoughts, the self/other divide softening or dropping away, nothing felt lacking or in excess, timeless amid time ...

    I wish Andrew were still here, I would have loved (beyond loves and hates and all debates, of course! ) to hear is impression. Could he doubt that the heart of Just Sitting is not here?

    (Sorry, ran a bit long).

    Gassho, J

    STLah
    Last edited by Jundo; 09-13-2020 at 01:02 AM.
    ALL OF LIFE IS OUR TEMPLE

  14. #64
    Member Onka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Rural Queensland, so-called Australia
    COMMENT DELETED

    Commented deleted for harsh language. We did have complaints, and I concur that it was not appropriate here.

    Gassho, Jundo
    Last edited by Jundo; 09-13-2020 at 08:59 AM.
    穏 On (Calm)
    火 Ka (Fires)
    They/She.

  15. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by Onka View Post
    COMMENT DELETED
    I wholeheartedly agree and couldn’t have worded this any better, so worth the extra sentences imho

    thank you

    gassho

    risho
    -stlah
    Last edited by Jundo; 09-13-2020 at 09:00 AM.

  16. #66
    COMMENT DELETED
    There are plenty of good books on the history of Ch'an and Zen, including The Circle of the Way by Barbara O'Brien.

    Historical differences between schools serve to illustrate points of practice, and different approaches. Were it not for Dogen's differences with other schools, we might not have Shikantaza and Soto Zen at all and the differences between Rinzai and Soto Zen continue to this day, even as they point to the same thing.

    Also, please Onka, it would have been super easy to make your point with less harsh language. There was absolutely no need for the B words.

    Apologies for use of more than three sentences.

    Gassho
    Kokuu
    -sattoday-
    Last edited by Jundo; 09-13-2020 at 09:00 AM.

  17. #67
    Member Onka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Rural Queensland, so-called Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Kokuu View Post
    There are plenty of good books on the history of Ch'an and Zen, including The Circle of the Way by Barbara O'Brien.

    Historical differences between schools serve to illustrate points of practice, and different approaches. Were it not for Dogen's differences with other schools, we might not have Shikantaza and Soto Zen at all and the differences between Rinzai and Soto Zen continue to this day, even as they point to the same thing.

    Also, please Onka, it would have been super easy to make your point with less harsh language. There was absolutely no need for the B words.

    Apologies for use of more than three sentences.

    Gassho
    Kokuu
    -sattoday-
    For those playing at home the B word is a working class word for nonsense which is how I was using it, as well as testicles but there are nuances within English working class language that would require a Noam Chomsky lecture to grasp. To working class folk like me the B word is in no way harsh language (my Grandfather was Cockney but Cockney rhyming slang is a whole other beast lol) but hey ho. The historical stuff I was talking about was the BW vs JC stuff that a cursory Google search reveals all kinds of things.
    Gassho
    Onka
    Sat
    穏 On (Calm)
    火 Ka (Fires)
    They/She.

  18. #68
    For those playing at home the B word is a working class word for nonsense which is how I was using it, as well as testicles but there are nuances within English working class language that would require a Noam Chomsky lecture to grasp. To working class folk like me the B word is in no way harsh language (my Grandfather was Cockney but Cockney rhyming slang is a whole other beast lol) but hey ho.
    It is a word for nonsense here too but harsh language. I really don't think we need Chomsky or a lecture on working class language but rather a bit of common sense of what is appropriate. If you mean nonsense, say nonsense. Everyone else here seems to manage, regardless of their background.


    It is also very bad form to talk about a teacher like this:

    IMHO BW has some blind spots just as Jundo does.
    Since we are studying the precepts again, you may wish to pay attention to #6:

    Not to broadcast the misdeeds or faults of the Buddhist assembly, nor encourage others to do so.

    You are not a newbie anymore. We really need more respect and deference and less of the working class anarchist. Deference is not something that comes easily to many of us but is appropriate here and part of training and dropping ego.


    Gassho
    Kokuu
    -sattoday-

  19. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by Onka View Post
    DELETED
    Commented deleted for harsh language. We did have complaints, and I concur that it was not appropriate here.

    Gassho, Jundo
    ALL OF LIFE IS OUR TEMPLE

  20. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by Jundo View Post
    Another small sign of the "roots" of Shikantaza is in the Xin Xin Ming (Inscription on Trust in Mind), a classic chant of the Soto school traditionally attributed to the 3rd Ancestor in Chiina, Sengcan. In fact, it is probably not by Sengcan, but scholars still believe that it is from early on in the Tang Dynasty, maybe 7th-8th century C.E. It has been celebrated in the Zen Lineages for over 1000 years. It certainly expresses the equanimity, non-choosing, neither running toward and entangling with the world nor running away that Master Dogen conveys in Fukanzazengi ...

    In Fukanzazengi, he writes:



    Some of those lines are from the Xin Xin Ming directly ...



    Now, if that is not precisely the attitude of sitting in the equanimity of Shikantaza, neither running from the world nor toward it, non-gaining, not discriminating, free of opinions, without aversions [dislikes] and attractions [likes], dropping thoughts, the self/other divide softening or dropping away, nothing felt lacking or in excess, timeless amid time ...

    I wish Andrew were still here, I would have loved (beyond loves and hates and all debates, of course! ) to hear is impression. Could he doubt that the heart of Just Sitting is not here?

    (Sorry, ran a bit long).

    Gassho, J

    STLah

    "Consider motion in stillness
    and stillness in motion;
    both movement and stillness disappear." - Shikantanza
    It's impossible to give an apple and describe its taste to someone who doesn't want to taste it.

    Gassho
    Sat

  21. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyoshin View Post
    I'm sorry, but this comment just doesn't sit right with me. Delete the b-word, sure. But if you had a problem with Onka saying Jundo has blind spots, why not say it in the first place, as you should have? Did you get annoyed at her attempt to explain her use of the b-word, and then decide to look for further reasons for public chastisement? I ask because it very much looks like that's what happened, and I find that troubling in the extreme.

    I can't imagine that any offense or disrespect was intended by saying that Jundo has blind spots. An innocuous utterance, it seems to me. It's true of everyone, and in context it made sense to say, as she was essentially noting that nobody is perfect, least of all herself. Im flabbergasted that that particular statement warrants chastisement at all, much less a public one.

    Apologies for the long post but I'm shocked and perturbed by this turn of events.

    Gassho
    Kyōshin
    Satlah


    Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
    In the last two days I started to understand the meaning of Sangha as a practice. Very valuable lessons since yesterday from all of you.

    Gassho
    Sat

  22. #72
    Member Onka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Rural Queensland, so-called Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyoshin View Post
    I'm sorry, but this comment just doesn't sit right with me. Delete the b-word, sure. But if you had a problem with Onka saying Jundo has blind spots, why not say it in the first place, as you should have? Did you get annoyed at her attempt to explain her use of the b-word, and then decide to look for further reasons for public chastisement? I ask because it very much looks like that's what happened, and I find that troubling in the extreme.

    I can't imagine that any offense or disrespect was intended by saying that Jundo has blind spots. An innocuous utterance, it seems to me. It's true of everyone, and in context it made sense to say, as she was essentially noting that nobody is perfect, least of all herself. Im flabbergasted that that particular statement warrants chastisement at all, much less a public one.

    Apologies for the long post but I'm shocked and perturbed by this turn of events.

    Gassho
    Kyōshin
    Satlah


    Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk
    Thanks Kyoshin but it's all good. As you know language is powerful as well as often loaded. Another discussion for after Ango might be about what role Class has on Buddhism in the West, that and why Buddhism in the West is so white.
    Chopping wood, carrying water for me this Ango.
    Gassho
    Onka
    Sat
    穏 On (Calm)
    火 Ka (Fires)
    They/She.

  23. #73
    I am mildly surprised by the turn this conversation has taken and by the bickering happening.

    SatToday
    Bion
    -------------------------
    When you put Buddha’s activity into practice, only then are you a buddha. When you act like a fool, then you’re a fool. - Sawaki Roshi

  24. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by A.J. View Post
    I listed considerations my question was based on but I did not make any claims about what the Zen tradition was in the early days for certain. The fact that you need to start with internet name-calling as a Zen priest demonstrates that you don't have room for discussion. No wonder you limit everyone to three sentences and then you go beyond that more than anyone. Between that and your tendency to shut people down you seem to have some kind of control problem. No wonder you started all that drama with the Hardcore Zen people a decade ago when Brad Warner wouldn't meet with you as you requested and then you made allegations that some other Zen priest punched you in the face. It's unfortunate that it's the people with the control issues who are motivated to get things like this going. I'm sure I'm not the first dissatisfied customer but your thread archives only go back as far as 2020. Good riddance. I won't be back.
    Oh my, what has been going on here? Newbie troll, it looks like.

    Gassho,

    Kirk

    sat
    流文

    I know nothing.

  25. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by Tomás Sard View Post
    I just sent a message to Jundo this morning explaining exactly the same story. Some people on the zen reddit subforum are trying to prove that Dogen never went to China, was never given Dharma transmission by Rujing and that Shikantaza is the same as "prayer-meditation". Which is funny, because there are actual scientific studies proving the benefits of zazen. Before joining TreeLeaf I read their threads for some months, but the people are incredibly toxic to each other and everyone is trying to play zen master. And some members are clearly trying to create a cult around only reading early zen masters. Plus, they also claim that zen is not connected to Buddhism in the first place...
    I don't think that we need scientific studies that prove the benefits of zazen. These studies are looking at physical and mental changes, which may arise with any meditative practice, but that's not the goal of shikantaza.

    Taking seriously any conspiracy theory on Reddit is a path to disaster. There are people there who have nothing better to do than to argue with others.

    Gassho,

    Kirk

    sat
    流文

    I know nothing.

  26. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by Onka View Post
    Thanks Kyoshin but it's all good. As you know language is powerful as well as often loaded. Another discussion for after Ango might be about what role Class has on Buddhism in the West, that and why Buddhism in the West is so white.
    Chopping wood, carrying water for me this Ango.
    Gassho
    Onka
    Sat
    My apologies to everyone, I should have brought up my concern privately. I will delete the comment.

    Gassho
    Kyōshin
    Satlah

    Sent from my moto g(7) power using Tapatalk

  27. #77
    I want to thank all who have participated in this discussion regardless of intention or expression. While I do not condone words that hurt or offend, I have learned much about Zen history and Zen practice--and practitioners--through this discussion. You have all made me grateful to be a part of this sangha.

    Gassho,

    Hobun

    ST

    Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

  28. #78
    Member Hokin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Location
    Ixtlahuacan De Los Membrillos, Mexico
    Hello everyone!

    I find that one can eventually trace basic "shikantaza" teachings even back to good ol' Shakyamuni himself, if you really read through the pali tipitaka, there are very many cases where one can see how much stress is made of "SITTING DOWN CROSSLEGGED" (निसीदति, पल्लङ्कं आभुजित्वा) with "BODY ERECT" (उजुं कायं पणिधाय), "JUST OBSERVING", while "SIMPLY KNOWING" (पजानाति) and "RELAXING/LETTING GO" (पस्स even of "NIBBANA" itself!), to finally, being RID OF DESIRE AND ADVERSION FOR ANYTHING IN THE WORLD (विनेय्य लोके अभिज्झा दोमनस्सं) and MAKE AN END TO SUFFERING. (Check for sure, amongst so many other early texts, the 'twin' ANAPANASATI & SATIPATTHANA SUTTA -two of the most, if not THE most, detailed texts on sitting meditation we are left with among the Buddha's original teachings- as well as the MULAPARIYAYA SUTTA. Respectively suttas number 118, 10 and 1 of the Majjhimanikaya collection of discourses.)
    Never forget, also, that he (Buddha) completely woke up (realized enlightenment), only when he let go of the "way-seeking mind" itself (which included a good amount of kinds of different meditation techniques existing at his time in india, which he personally tried, but felt they failed as to make an end to suffering) and sat under the bodhi-tree with the very same actitude he had once when only a child, when he ran away from the crowd attending a festival and sat under a rose-apple tree, finally free of anxieties and ideas of achievement, but open minded (and hearted).

    But I will leave you with just these two much interesting (to me) quotations from those very early suttas as well...


    1) फस्सद्वयं सुखदुक्खे उपेक्खे
    अनानुरुद्धो अविरुद्ध केनचि लोके
    Look with equanimity at the duality of painful and pleasant contacts, without favoring or opposing anything. (Samyutta Nikaya 35,95)

    Doesn't this sound shockingly similar to the first two verses of the Hin Hsin Ming? Which is shockingly similar, in its turn, to the "basic shikantaza tachings", for that matter...

    And...:

    2) तस्स सम्मा विमुत्तस्स
    सन्तचित्तस्स भिक्खुनो
    कतस्स पटिचयो नत्थि
    करणीयं न विज्जति
    For that one, rightly freed,
    a practitioner with peaceful mind,
    there’s nothing to be improved,
    and nothing more to do. (Anguttara Nikaya 6.55)


    Reminds me a bit of "mushotoku", doesn't it?

    Anyway, as I already stated, there are sooooo many exemples of "shikantaza" teachings in the first pali suttas!!! One just has to go and read with open mind and heart...and experience in practice also...that is fundamental!
    I think...

    Gassho.
    Hokin.
    ST.

  29. #79
    I moved most of the discussion on teachers and students to its own thread here:

    https://www.treeleaf.org/forums/show...Western-Sangha
    ALL OF LIFE IS OUR TEMPLE

  30. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by Hokin View Post
    Hello everyone!

    I find that one can eventually trace basic "shikantaza" teachings even back to good ol' Shakyamuni himself, if you really read through the pali tipitaka, there are very many cases where one can see how much stress is made of "SITTING DOWN CROSSLEGGED" (निसीदति, पल्लङ्कं आभुजित्वा) with "BODY ERECT" (उजुं कायं पणिधाय), "JUST OBSERVING", while "SIMPLY KNOWING" (पजानाति) and "RELAXING/LETTING GO" (पस्स even of "NIBBANA" itself!), to finally, being RID OF DESIRE AND ADVERSION FOR ANYTHING IN THE WORLD (विनेय्य लोके अभिज्झा दोमनस्सं) and MAKE AN END TO SUFFERING. (Check for sure, amongst so many other early texts, the 'twin' ANAPANASATI & SATIPATTHANA SUTTA -two of the most, if not THE most, detailed texts on sitting meditation we are left with among the Buddha's original teachings- as well as the MULAPARIYAYA SUTTA. Respectively suttas number 118, 10 and 1 of the Majjhimanikaya collection of discourses.)
    Never forget, also, that he (Buddha) completely woke up (realized enlightenment), only when he let go of the "way-seeking mind" itself (which included a good amount of kinds of different meditation techniques existing at his time in india, which he personally tried, but felt they failed as to make an end to suffering) and sat under the bodhi-tree with the very same actitude he had once when only a child, when he ran away from the crowd attending a festival and sat under a rose-apple tree, finally free of anxieties and ideas of achievement, but open minded (and hearted).

    But I will leave you with just these two much interesting (to me) quotations from those very early suttas as well...


    1) फस्सद्वयं सुखदुक्खे उपेक्खे
    अनानुरुद्धो अविरुद्ध केनचि लोके
    Look with equanimity at the duality of painful and pleasant contacts, without favoring or opposing anything. (Samyutta Nikaya 35,95)

    Doesn't this sound shockingly similar to the first two verses of the Hin Hsin Ming? Which is shockingly similar, in its turn, to the "basic shikantaza tachings", for that matter...

    And...:

    2) तस्स सम्मा विमुत्तस्स
    सन्तचित्तस्स भिक्खुनो
    कतस्स पटिचयो नत्थि
    करणीयं न विज्जति
    For that one, rightly freed,
    a practitioner with peaceful mind,
    there’s nothing to be improved,
    and nothing more to do. (Anguttara Nikaya 6.55)


    Reminds me a bit of "mushotoku", doesn't it?

    Anyway, as I already stated, there are sooooo many exemples of "shikantaza" teachings in the first pali suttas!!! One just has to go and read with open mind and heart...and experience in practice also...that is fundamental!
    I think...

    Gassho.
    Hokin.
    ST.
    Oh, thank you Hokin, this is an important post. In an earlier discussion with A.J., I also pointed out some scholars' descriptions of "Jhana of the Suttas" vs. "Jhana in the later commentaries":

    By the way, Andrew, you might be interested in the history and examination of Jhana and samadhi by Richard Shankman. He makes the argument that the Fourth Jhana, originally the highest, is actually a putting aside of blissful and highly concentrated states in favor of equanimious sitting with a sense of wholeness, at least as described in the Suttas before the Vishudimagga and other commentaries (perhaps under the influence of Bhraman/Hindu practices which the Buddha originally may have rejected) turned the meaning of Jhana to some kinds of deeply concentrated and blissful, even other worldly states:

    "Just Sitting" Shikantaza which we practice at Treeleaf is placed in historical context perhaps closer to the intent of the older Pali Suttas for "open, spacious, aware samadhi which thus brings insight" than other later forms.
    More here:

    https://www.treeleaf.org/forums/show...l=1#post266905

    and

    https://www.treeleaf.org/forums/show...l=1#post266908

    Gassho, J

    SatTodayLAH

    PS - Hokin, I am really impressed with how you got all that fancy writing in our Forum! I didn't know you could read Hebrew!
    ALL OF LIFE IS OUR TEMPLE

  31. #81
    Quote Originally Posted by Tomás Sard View Post
    I was reading a book on the history of zen and I came across a chapter that explains how zen divided between the northern and the southern school. One placed more importance on gradual training and the other said that enlightenment is instantaneous and does not depen upon meditation practice. The book is in Spanish tho. I am sure that other members can offer much material on the matter. Also, I am terrible at offering quotations, but I can say that from my personal perspective, Shikantaza is just a "formal" way to do Zazen. The key is to practice Zazen in everything. And if you sit in formal meditation for a while, you can tell the difference that it makes in comparison with just being mindful without actually sitting.

    In terms of gaining understanding from the old geezers, what better geezer than Buddha himself, who heavily emphasized sitting meditation.

    Gassho, Tomás
    Sat

    Sorry for going over 3 sentences.

    Chan School split into Southern and Northern schools when the 5th patriarch passed down his robe to the 6th patriarch and asked him to traveled down south to avoid persecution. The 6th patriarch in general view promoted Sudden Enlightenment while the other disciple of the 5th patriarch went North preached gradual enlightenment. Any misunderstanding on my part please make correction...

    Gassho,
    Judy
    SAT

  32. #82
    Quote Originally Posted by MJG27 View Post
    Chan School split into Southern and Northern schools when the 5th patriarch passed down his robe to the 6th patriarch and asked him to traveled down south to avoid persecution. The 6th patriarch in general view promoted Sudden Enlightenment while the other disciple of the 5th patriarch went North preached gradual enlightenment. Any misunderstanding on my part please make correction...

    Gassho,
    Judy
    SAT
    Hi Judy,

    It is now generally agreed by historians that this is not really an historical fact, but more a legend which developed to justify the folks (all modern Zen schools) who derive their Lineage from the 6th Patriarch, Hui-Neng (who, by the way, is not a fully historical figure, although there was someone who lived by that name). In fact, both "North" and "South," and all the Zen schools today, have elements that are BOTH sudden and gradual in enlightenment and practice (e.g., that one may suddenly realize wisdom in a moment or many moments, but must slowly refine this fact over time).

    Even though not quite "historical fact," the story and symbolism of Hui-Neng are very important to us.

    https://www.thezensite.com/ZenEssays...s_in_Chan.html

    Gassho, Jundo

    STLah
    Last edited by Jundo; 09-19-2020 at 07:06 PM.
    ALL OF LIFE IS OUR TEMPLE

  33. #83
    Quote Originally Posted by Jundo View Post
    Hi Judy,

    It is now generally agreed by historians that this is not really an historical fact, but more a legend which developed to justify the folks (all modern Zen schools) who derive their Lineage from the 6th Patriarch, Hui-Neng (who, by the way, is not a fully historical figure, although there was someone who lived by that name). In fact, both "North" and "South," and all the Zen schools today, have elements that are BOTH sudden and gradual in enlightenment and practice (e.g., that one may suddenly realize wisdom in a moment or many moments, but must slowly refine this fact over time).

    Even though not quite "historical fact," the story and symbolism of Hui-Neng are very important to us.

    https://www.thezensite.com/ZenEssays...s_in_Chan.html

    Gassho, Jundo

    STLah

    Thank you Jundo! Apparently I know only the Chen's side of the story in Mandarin.

    Gassho,
    Judy Sat
    Last edited by Jundo; 09-19-2020 at 07:06 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •