Opening the Hand of Thought - Chapter 5
Zazen and the True Self ...
I am writing a book with an old friend, a theoretical physicist, in which he shoots out an idea from physics and I respond from a Zen point of view (not sure if the book will ever be finished, as we only have a few pages so far) ...
... but one idea we both kinda agree with is that, from one point of view, we are not just separate individuals. Whatever the universe is, that is the stuff that we are. As I put it in the book, when you sneeze, one way to look at it is that it is the universe sneezing with your nose (which is just the universe too). We are literally the universe come alive, the life of the party! An aspect of our Zen Practice is to get past our small self to realize such fact. Enjoy the Party! [claps]
Uchiyama Roshi may be a little fuzzy in nailing down what is this Universal Self ... but perhaps one has to be. The more one tries to stick a name and definition on it, the further one gets. If you try to call it Amida Buddha, God, Stanley, the Universe, Matter and Energy, Emptiness, True Mind, True Self, Universal Self ... well, you do an injustice. Best perhaps to say (in my opinion) that Zen Folks know some viewless view which is very Whole and Positive which is us and us just that.
Some people struggled in Chapter 1 with Uchiyama's statements such as "when you die, your universe goes with you", so I will briefly link to what I said there:
http://www.treeleaf.org/forums/showt...l=1#post170279
Remember that, as you read this book, it is the universe reading! [scared]
So, what does the universe have to say about this chapter?
Gassh, J
Opening the Hand of Thought - Chapter 5
I struggle with this chapter. For now I hardly had this feeling of deep connection with the whole of the universe. I do realize the atoms in my body ultimately relate to the deep cosmos, but I would not call those atoms and molecules a Self, universal or not, they are just atoms and molecules like the dirt on my shoes. It seems even more problematic to talk about 'life pervading the whole of the universe' - how to define 'life' in this way? An animal, a flower, a micro-organism can be called 'alive' while we would refrain from calling a rock 'alive' - especially a rock devoided of living organisms. Of course one can stretch words - but then one ends up in 'the night in which all cows are grey' as Hegel said. I guess deep meditative states make us experience a kind of universal unity, but forgive me for being sceptical as I think that such feelings are responses of our bodies which are forced into long periods of relaxed motionless states and not so much insights into a Universal Self.
Gassho
Roland
#SatToday
Opening the Hand of Thought - Chapter 5
Yes Risho, it's also about 'how to describe it'. I do like the expression 'softening of the boundaries' between self and the other, that's something I do experience. I'm even able to feel the energy of trees and the power of a mountain. But yet talking about a Universal Self makes me uneasy.
Gassho,
Roland
#SatToday